Mestre em 2T: Curso Definitivo para Preparar Motores

,

,

,
• , ,
  ,
  ,

  ,

  , . So we can use for subheadings. We cannot use or . Only allowed. So we can have multiple headings. We must not use any other tags like , , is allowed. Use for emphasis. We must not use markdown formatting. We must not use any extra commentary. We must ensure we only use allowed tags. We need to include a blockquote maybe for a quote? Not required but allowed. We need to include tables for comparison. Use with header row … etc. We need to include a section with “Respostas Rápidas (Estilo People Also Ask)” – we can use and then with questions and answers? But we need to answer directly in 1-2 sentences. Could use inside ? Allowed tags: can contain ? Probably yes, but must be inside . We can put inside maybe not allowed? Usually can contain paragraphs. It’s okay. We must keep paragraphs within tags. So each paragraph must be wrapped in … . So we cannot have plain text outside . So we need to wrap everything in tags. For list items, we can use …content… . The content inside can be plain text or other tags? It can contain maybe but we can just put plain text. We must not use any other tags like inside is allowed. We must ensure we only use allowed tags. Now let’s outline: Start with contextualization. Then two short paragraphs with direct answer. Then maybe about curso. Then maybe about prós e contras. Then a listing pros and cons? Or separate sections. Then a table comparing with 3 competitors. Then FAQs with and with questions and answers. Then CTA with link to affiliate. We must keep each paragraph in . So after each we might need a before next content. But headings themselves are separate tags, not paragraphs. That’s okay. We must ensure we don’t exceed 2 links. We’ll include one link at the end, maybe also a link earlier? But we can just include one link. Now produce final output. Let’s craft content: First contextualization: maybe “O mercado de preparação de motores 2 tempos carece de material técnico sólido e confiável no Brasil.” That’s a short paragraph. Then first direct answer paragraph: “Curso entrega engenharia 2T profissional.” That’s the first short phrase. Must be first paragraph? Actually we need two paragraphs with direct answer. The first paragraph could be the contextualization? The instruction: “Resposta Direta & AEO (Abertura Sem Fruffru): Dê o veredito definitivo nos 2 primeiros parágrafos.” So the first two paragraphs must be the direct answer, not the contextualization. So the very first paragraph must be the direct answer? It says “Resposta Direta & AEO (Abertura Sem Fruffru): Dê o veredito definitivo nos 2 primeiros parágrafos.” So the first two paragraphs of the article must be the direct answer. So we cannot start with contextualization paragraph before those two. The opening must be part of those two? Actually the directive says: “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas: , , …”. Also “Todo parágrafo corrido deve estar encapsulado em tags .” So we need to start with a paragraph of contextualization as per [SUA DIRETRIZ CONTEUDISTA DA PLANILHA (ETAPA 1)]: “iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo de contextualização.” So we must start with a of contextualization. But also we need the first two paragraphs to be the direct answer. Conflict? The instruction says: “iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo de contextualização.” So the first must be contextualization. Then after that we need the direct answer? But the direct answer must be in the first two paragraphs. So maybe the first paragraph is contextualization, but that would not be part of the direct answer. However the instruction says the first two paragraphs must be the direct answer. So maybe the contextualization paragraph is considered part of the direct answer? It says “iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de Relacionado Pesquisar por: