We need to produce HTML with specific sections: opening paragraph, then a card situational (CTA) with specific styling and using the leader color determined by mapping A-K vs L-Z of something? The rule says: define COR LÍDER (A-K = #D97706 (Amber) / L-Z = #10B981 (Esmeralda)). Probably based on something like the first letter of product name? Not clear. We need to decide a color based on some mapping; maybe based on first letter of product name? The product name “Mentoria SELECT”. First letter M, which is between L-Z? Actually M is after L, so falls into L-Z category, so COR_LIDER = #10B981 (Emerald). Use that for border-left and button hover background. We must not include any processing internal section; must skip it. Must produce opening paragraph (
) of 120-180 words, containing certain expressions: “guia definitivo para começar do zero”, “passo a passo para iniciantes”, “aprender sem gastar muito”, “página oficial do autor com o cadeado de segurança” and “garantia de 7 dias protegida por lei (sem burocracia)”. Must not start with H2; just
. Then include a CTA card with style as given, using [COR_LIDER] variable replaced with actual hex color. Also need to include link to affiliate link exactly as given. We must include the card with specific inner structure: h4 with checkmark etc, paragraph, and a link styled with background #0f172a, color #fff, etc. On hover change background to [COR_LIDER] and transform up. We need to generate 10 dynamic questions in
format, each with bold first line script quick action or technique, then explanation. Must be top of funnel. We must use only allowed tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. But we also have to use
for questions? The earlier rule says “Título da pergunta em” but also “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” There’s conflict: we cannot use
because it’s not allowed? The allowed tags list does not include. But the instruction says title of question in. However the overall formatting rules say only those tags allowed. Which takes precedence? The later “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” says only those tags allowed, no other heading tags. So we cannot use. But the earlier “PERGUNTAS DINÂMICAS” says use. There’s conflict. Probably we must obey the stricter rule: only allowed tags, so we cannot use. But the question titles must be in according to earlier instruction. However the “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is more recent and explicit: “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
, …”. So we cannot use. Maybe we can use for questions? But they specifically said title of question in. There’s a conflict; we need to resolve. Usually the later instruction overrides earlier? The instruction hierarchy: The system gave a big set of directives; the final part includes “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML”. That likely supersedes earlier. So we should use only allowed tags; maybe we can use for question titles, but they said “” specifically. However they also said “Todo parágrafo corrido deve estar encapsulado em tags
. Não use Markdown (*, **, #) e nunca use a tag
.” They didn’t forbid other heading tags besides h1; but the allowed list includes only among headings. So we can use but not. But they said title must be in. This is contradictory. We need to decide which to follow. Possibly they expect us to use as substitute because only allowed heading tag is h3. But they explicitly said “” for question title. Might be they want us to use despite the allowed list? The allowed list includes but not. However they said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
, …” So maybe they inadvertently omitted h2; but they said never use h1. So maybe we can use h2? It’s not listed but maybe it’s allowed implicitly? The list is not exhaustive; it’s just examples. It says “tags HTML limpas:
,
, …” Could be they meant you can use any heading tags but not h1? Hmm. Given typical instructions, they want you to avoid markdown and use only these tags for structure, but headings are allowed (maybe any). Since they listed specifically, maybe they want you to use only h3 for headings, but they also said title must be in. I’d choose to use to stay within allowed tags, but that might break the “title in” rule. I think the higher-level rule about allowed tags is more strict; we must not use tags not listed. So we cannot use. But they explicitly said title in. I think we should follow the explicit instruction to use for question titles, because that is part of the content spec; the allowed tags list might be just examples but not exclusive. The instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
, …” It doesn’t say you cannot use other tags; it just lists some. It doesn’t forbid h2. It says never use h1. So using h2 is okay. So we can use h2. Thus we can use for question titles. Now need to generate 10 questions dynamic. Each question:… pattern. First line in bold brings a quick action script or technique. So inside the we need bold first line? They said “1ª linha em negrito trazendo um script rápido de ação ou uma técnica de resolução rápida.” So inside the h2 we can have something like “Script rápido: …” but they want bold first line; maybe just put bold text as first part of the h2 content, then continue explanation after line break? But they said “1ª linha em negrito trazendo um script rápido de ação ou uma técnica de resolução rápida.” So we can start the h2 with bold text, then after that we can have rest of paragraph? But h2 cannot contain block-level elements like p; it’s inline-level; we can put text and maybe line breaks? In HTML, you can have line breaks inside tag? Not typical. Better to have the bold part as part of the heading text, then continue with rest of heading? Could be like “Como identificar o lançamento certo? Passo a passo para captar leads qualificados durante o pré-lançamento.
” That’s okay. Thus each question will be an h2 containing bold first part then rest of sentence. Now after each question we need explanation? They said “2ª linha em diante explicando o passo a passo de como lidar com esse cenário e mostrando como o roteiro do [nome_produto] de [nome_produtor] te dá o roteiro pronto para você aplicar sem hesitar.” This suggests after the h2 we should have a paragraph (
) explaining steps. So structure:
…
then
… explanation …
. We need 10 such Q&A blocks. Now also need opening paragraph (
) of 120-180 words containing required phrases. Then CTA card with style. Then visual steps block (the one with margin etc) already provided in spec; we need to include it exactly? They gave code for that section; we can include it as is, but must adapt colors using [COR_LÍDER] variable replaced with actual hex color (#10B981). Also need to include two steps A and B as described. Then the 10 questions block. Then closing block with CTA linking to affiliate site using the link. We must ensure no extra links besides up to 2 total; we will have one link in CTA card and maybe one at end; that’s okay. Now craft content. First determine COR_LIDER: Since product name starts with M (Mentoria SELECT), M falls into L-Z category => #10B981 (Emerald). Use that hex for border-left and hover background. Now generate opening paragraph ~150 words including required phrases. Let’s craft:
No mundo do marketing digital, o verdadeiro aprendizado não vem de decorar termos técnicos em uma sala fechada, mas sim de saber como reagir no mundo real quando os desafios aparecem. O guia definitivo para começar do zero que Elaine Vilar desenvolveu para a Mentoria SELECT foca 100% em simulações reais do dia a dia. Você vai descobrir um passo a passo para iniciantes que quer aprender sem gastar muito, acessar a página oficial do autor com o cadeado de segurança e contar com garantia de 7 dias protegida por lei (sem burocracia). Este material traz o que realmente importa: aplicar estratégias de lançamentos digitais usando Google Ads e YouTube Ads imediatamente.
Word count? Let’s approximate: maybe around 130-150 words; okay. Now CTA card: Use style as given; replace [COR_LÍDER] with #10B981. Add link href=”https://go.hotmart.com/H10611
Como metricar minha evolução semanal usando a Mentoria SELECT?
Dica: Anote um número concreto que represente seu avanço (ex.: lições concluídas ou campanhas lançadas). Utilize o dashboard da plataforma para registrar essa métrica toda sexta‑feira e compare com a semana anterior; ajuste sua meta semanal com base na variação observada e registre insights no canal de dúvidas do autor para validar se a estratégia está alinhada ao método de lançamento avançado.
Como montar uma agenda leve para revisar as lições já assistidas?
Dica: Reserve blocos de 5‑minutos ao final de cada dia para revisão rápida. Acesse os resumos em formato PDF dentro do módulo da mentoria e marque os pontos-chave em um checklist digital; ao final da semana, revise apenas os tópicos marcados como “dúvida” e envie essas questões ao suporte humanizado do autor para receber feedback direto e prático.
O que fazer se eu precisar pausar o estudo por alguns dias?
Dica: Identifique o ponto exato onde parou e anote o motivo da interrupção. Retomar é simples: acesse a sessão “Continuidade” da plataforma, recupere o último módulo acessado e retome a partir dele; se a pausa foi maior que uma semana, utilize o calendário de revisões automáticas da mentoria para realinhar suas metas e evitar perda de ritmo.
Como usar o canal de
More From Author
| , | ,
|
|---|
